a big draw for me with Topaz (and Upscayl) is local offline processing.Įdit: my honest recommendation though, would be Photo AI over Gigapixel - the examples where it 'outperforms' photo AI are few and far between. you might not need that extra oomph if the ones you use work for you.īefore Topaz, i used Upscayl (still do sometimes if Topaz can't nail a specific thing), which even lets you add additional/your own models. Topaz is just the current reigning king with image or video upscaling. it's all a bit of trial and error, which is an area pretty much all AI software could improve, it's probably just not possible yet.īut either one will get you that ~10-30% better results than all the competitors will. and you might end up wanting to do this anyway, cause not all areas of an image will always get the exact effect you're aiming for, regardless of how many apps you have. if you're willing to spend a little extra time and toss a few different versions of an upscaled image in an image editor to mask different versions/layers together, you definitely wouldn't 'need' both Photo/Giga. They aren't really transparent about what exactly is different about the first, but you just find that Photo might work on an image that Giga just whiffed on a bit. i have Gigapixel and PhotoAI and they're both amazing, just seems like Gigapixel has 2 models you can't access with Photo AI ("Lines" and "Very Compressed") but also doesn't have some features Photo does, like a 'Recover Original Detail' in the Denoise model, 'pinch to zoom' or other little things that aren't totally logical, but signal a different software UI/UX strategy).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |